I guess it's pretty easy to get along with both of them.
Hmm, well I can see what I can do. The other argument is that since we know people can get attacked now, leaving him without a weapon could get him killed.
[ he fails to see the problem with that scenario ]
I mean, if you're going to make that argument you need to let everyone who can't physically defend themselves have access to the same level of firepower. Otherwise he gets to protect himself at the expense of everyone else!
Well, we don't really give out weapons, but we also didn't control what people came here with. My point was mostly that people can make arguments about this in every direction, basically. Like I'm sure there are some people who don't want us to arm everyone, while others who would get mad if we tried to take their weapon away.
Oh, I wouldn't say that. You guys all killing each other isn't actually great for the endgame. A few deaths they can manage because of how many people they brought in, but they do need people alive by the end of the two month mark.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Hmm, well I can see what I can do. The other argument is that since we know people can get attacked now, leaving him without a weapon could get him killed.
no subject
I mean, if you're going to make that argument you need to let everyone who can't physically defend themselves have access to the same level of firepower. Otherwise he gets to protect himself at the expense of everyone else!
[ and this is how you end up with america... ]
no subject
no subject
no subject